31-10-2025, 06:19 PM
Forums are for discussions — they are not the right place to present formal research.
One of the main problems here is all the AI hate.
AI is widely used today in almost every field of academic research, especially in linguistic and philological processes.
Elon Musk, for example, created a foundation working on Sumerian texts; NASA, Oxford, and Yale all use AI for their research workflows.
There simply doesn’t exist any serious research today that does not use AI in some way.
The problem is not the use of AI itself — the problem appears when your chief researcher is AI, and there is no human, doctoral-level philological process behind it.
AI will always produce a “translation” if you push it under any hypothesis.
A real translation, however, is when you have a Rosetta table, a structured linguistic process, and you use AI only to accelerate the work.
The Voynich, for example, has over 30,000 tokens and 234 folios — organizing that data alone can take 3–5 years.
I’m not interested in endless discussions.
I prefer to work with academics on the methodology — debating results without a method is pointless.
Best regards.
One of the main problems here is all the AI hate.
AI is widely used today in almost every field of academic research, especially in linguistic and philological processes.
Elon Musk, for example, created a foundation working on Sumerian texts; NASA, Oxford, and Yale all use AI for their research workflows.
There simply doesn’t exist any serious research today that does not use AI in some way.
The problem is not the use of AI itself — the problem appears when your chief researcher is AI, and there is no human, doctoral-level philological process behind it.
AI will always produce a “translation” if you push it under any hypothesis.
A real translation, however, is when you have a Rosetta table, a structured linguistic process, and you use AI only to accelerate the work.
The Voynich, for example, has over 30,000 tokens and 234 folios — organizing that data alone can take 3–5 years.
I’m not interested in endless discussions.
I prefer to work with academics on the methodology — debating results without a method is pointless.
Best regards.