The Modern Forgery Hypothesis

[proto57]

But I think anyone reading this will understand my pointing this out: Forgery counter arguments are not allowed, and banned, deleted or otherwise censored in genuine argument threads; but genuine, or other alternate arguments ARE allowed in this forgery thread.

Other threads will henceforth hopefully not be derailed too much by discussions about your theory. Those discussions, with arguments for and against, can be held here.

How "derailed" exactly? If your 1420 Genuine European Cipher Herbal, cannot withstand counter points or criticism without being "derailed" by them, then it is clearly a weak theory. Any good theory can withstand debate by countering challenges to it. I do that, why can't you?

Rather than simply trying to eliminate rebuttal, why not explain why the points I present are wrong? A strong theory could do that. But I note that 1420 is constantly retreating from scrutiny, and censoring debate, and ignoring valid counterpoints without addressing them- and this is just one more example.

I don't consider Rene's, or the other's counterpoints, here on this thread, "derailing" this discussion. They ARE the discussion! I welcome it, and always have. I never do, nor feel a need to, stifle alternate views to my own. Open debate is the fuel for progress in science, and censorship is the death of it. It becomes religion, and ceases to be science, if dissent is not allowed.