12-09-2025, 05:38 PM
(12-09-2025, 05:30 PM)quimqu wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yes, in the EVA transliteration k and t are treated as different characters. But imagine that they both are k, the same character, and that the small loop.at the left is giving us the residual. So k would be k0 and t would be k1. Of course this would reduce the character set. And please, don't take it as I think it is right. I am just saying that the PM_cipher needs the residuals as the same glyph can cipher different original characters. I am thinking that maybe the residuals could be in a different booklet or "hidden" in the glyphs.
I thought we were discussing your specific implementation, k and t are both used in the table as two distinct characters. If there is a need to add residuals on top of existing character set, it should be via more subtle changes to the shape, like in two different l's from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. below.
