Fontanellean > 7 hours ago
oshfdk > 6 hours ago
(7 hours ago)Fontanellean Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I was wondering what the current status is of the hypothesis that Voynichese is a delta cipher, in other words, the idea that it is the transition from one word to the next that encodes information -- which characters are dropped and added and where, etc. This could encode plaintext letters or the numbers of an intermediate Polybius Square. I know papers like those of Timm and Schinner looked at word similarity in transitions, but I couldn't tell the degree to which this sort of encoding was ruled out. I also would have expected modern professional cryptography to have cracked it by now if this were the case, but perhaps I have too much faith in that.
Rafal > 6 hours ago
nablator > 6 hours ago
(6 hours ago)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think there have been a few discussions of ciphers that employ character-to-character transitions to encode information
Fontanellean > 2 hours ago
(6 hours ago)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(6 hours ago)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think there have been a few discussions of ciphers that employ character-to-character transitions to encode information
Also your verbose self-citation cipher: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It works on the idea that information is in "which characters are dropped and added". Very difficult (impossible?) to rule out.
nablator > 2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)Fontanellean Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are many different ways that could work, but it's a theory that to me seems attentive to many of the properties the text needs to have.
Fontanellean > 1 hour ago
(2 hours ago)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(2 hours ago)Fontanellean Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are many different ways that could work, but it's a theory that to me seems attentive to many of the properties the text needs to have.
It's not nearly restrictive enough. You need more constraints than frequent self-similarity to explain Voynichese. Also ambiguous word breaks make ciphers relying on words unlikely. There is a workaround with a possible re-parsing of tokens ignoring spaces that would also explain the rigid word structure.
nablator > 1 hour ago
(1 hour ago)Fontanellean Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That particular example isn't restrictive enough, but I'm simply referring to the general family of delta ciphers. At least they predict a general trend toward word similarity and phrase similarity for someone lacking the aid of a computer. I just want to make sure anything I investigate is deep within a parameter space that hasn't been excluded.