addekallstrom > 17-11-2024, 04:07 PM
RobGea > 17-11-2024, 06:11 PM
MarcoP > 17-11-2024, 06:55 PM
(17-11-2024, 04:07 PM)addekallstrom Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As I was thinking about this, I was reminded of the Zodiac ciphers from the 1970s. I'm sure most cipher nerds know that the Z-340 was cracked about four years ago now. It was cracked through a computer brute forcing every imaginable way to encode a text
Quote:Blake [...] responded to Oranchak’s talk with mathematical ideas about how to approach a code that includes both homophonic substitution — in which one letter might be swapped for more than one symbol — and transposition — in which letters are reordered in a systematic way. Oranchak and Blake began corresponding and eventually generated hundreds of thousands of possible ways to read the code.
RadioFM > 17-11-2024, 11:37 PM
BessAgritianin > 18-11-2024, 06:35 AM
(17-11-2024, 04:07 PM)addekallstrom Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view......
If all you are doing is hiding information about botany, why do you need to go to such lengths as the scribes did? Iirc both Alan Turing and the guy who cracked the Japanese code in WW2 worked on the manuscript (and failed), so, if you're a 14th century botanist who wants to hid information about your plants, why do you need a cipher that is more difficult to crack than the Germans and Japanese used in a world war?
GlennM > 08-01-2025, 04:55 AM
dashstofsk > 08-01-2025, 04:53 PM
(17-11-2024, 04:07 PM)addekallstrom Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view."What motivations would there be for creating it as a hoax with random gibberish?"
Rafal > 08-01-2025, 07:08 PM
dashstofsk > 08-01-2025, 07:59 PM
(08-01-2025, 07:08 PM)Rafal Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Manuscript may be something like book cipher
R. Sale > 08-01-2025, 09:10 PM