(10-09-2025, 07:16 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Looks cool, but it doesn't respect the CLS rules, as far as I can see?
Let me explain a bit more: we know, for example, that "qo" has a significant % of starting positions. If the natural language text (the input) has the same % of startin positions with, let's say, "t" and "m", "qo" will be assigned to "t" and "m" at the first position. In that case, we would find the same proportion of "qo" as the MS has. But De docta ignorantia has much more dispersion starting the words, so we don't see as many "qo" as the MS.
