03-08-2025, 09:21 PM
Hi Ruby,
I believe that only repetitions in the manuscript allow a reliable proof. I have described my exact procedure in my post to Bi3mw on page 2 (PDF the beginning). I have never used EVA or anything similar. For the following reason: If intelligent people have been using an alphabet for decades and haven't found a solution, it must be the alphabet's fault (assuming it's a natural language
).
Unfortunately, I can't transcribe my translation approaches into EVA or similar.
I'll use the example "gob" - the berry.
If I use EVA, this would be (please correct me if I'm translating incorrectly) "chod"
I find the letter that translates as "y" in EVA the craziest. Try it yourself. Go to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. In the search field at the bottom left, first enter the "star *" as a wildcard, followed by the letter "y" from the EVA alphabet. You'll get 15,263 hits, meaning 15,263 "y" appear in words. That seems suspiciously high for a y. (assuing it is a natural language)
I believe that only repetitions in the manuscript allow a reliable proof. I have described my exact procedure in my post to Bi3mw on page 2 (PDF the beginning). I have never used EVA or anything similar. For the following reason: If intelligent people have been using an alphabet for decades and haven't found a solution, it must be the alphabet's fault (assuming it's a natural language
). Unfortunately, I can't transcribe my translation approaches into EVA or similar.
I'll use the example "gob" - the berry.
If I use EVA, this would be (please correct me if I'm translating incorrectly) "chod"
I find the letter that translates as "y" in EVA the craziest. Try it yourself. Go to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. In the search field at the bottom left, first enter the "star *" as a wildcard, followed by the letter "y" from the EVA alphabet. You'll get 15,263 hits, meaning 15,263 "y" appear in words. That seems suspiciously high for a y. (assuing it is a natural language)