14-07-2025, 10:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-07-2025, 12:40 AM by i_want_links_damit.)
I don't want to bump the thread but unfortunately I ran out of edit time to explain the attached images so just this once I'll add some additional information...
The images show page pairs from the late 70s to the mid 80s. They show what are very compelling inner organs. A uterus, interesting with distinctive kink of the large intestine, two lungs, bladder and two kidneys/adrenal glands, two eyeballs or testes and an inner lining with a distinct curvy nodular form that is seen in many a inner lining of a mucus membrane maxing out surface area not just the uvula. I think the Czech interpretation is correct to strongly consider this though it is not the first.
I see Latinistic elements and I will not get into full specifics of what I have found so far as the project is still on going and only in the early stages. A lot is done but it is a big project. There are also strong indications of Asiatic elements which includes Onion Domes, upside down T and O maps and of course a Pangolin. Some of the faces seem to show a slight Asiatic Admixture. I've seen two dimensions in the text of external influences. This might not tell you as much as you think but there are two major discernible vectors. One goes through the Eastern Mediterranean down to Egypt (Syriac seems central stretching down to Kushite and also with an influence on Arabic) and the other takes a quite long journey roughly over the top of the Black Sea to the Caspian via central Asia or North India all the way down to the Philippines if not further. These do not necessarily impact the same thing in the text. One vector seems to be more similar to the script rather than the spoken language in it and the other more familiar with the spoken language.
The research has not yet separated this from ancient flows but it does seat the manuscript among certain languages or cultures in Europe with foreign influence. You'll see something similar with other European languages. If you consider Indo-European for example there will be odd correlations with language going quite deep toward the Indian Subcontinent and it seems to show similar relations. Some of it however so far seems a bit stronger than normal. You have to be careful with this as there are likely spurious matches. The text does something weird which I currently assume to be encoding that very remote Island languages happen to do which is to like to do things like turn the word ban into banana. I would be doubtful of an interpretation that is too localised. It's likely either one of the authors travelled or they are influenced by a lot of foreign literature that they are in possession off. I suspect a possible Chinese Whispers issue and the information in the manuscript to have bounced around a fair bit making it hard to place. In this era the Muslims had taken a lot of these texts prior and then we had taken them back with layers of foreign influences. I would be sceptical of a linguistic pattern that is pure straight Latin without some other influences or that does not somehow explain the seemingly foreign and by that I mean remote elements in the book. If there is a true language in it of meaning ad not just made from random jumbled up bits of language then I would expect it to likely be somewhat informal or colloquial albeit a bit of a mix. Regardless, the text has a very high probability of being derived from something that bounced around the Islamic world and that in turn was derived from the frontier of their crusades and the literature they captured from Greece, Egypt and India to then be recaptured and presumably Latinised and Germanised to some degree or similar. I find any interpretation that does not reflect this surprising.
The images show page pairs from the late 70s to the mid 80s. They show what are very compelling inner organs. A uterus, interesting with distinctive kink of the large intestine, two lungs, bladder and two kidneys/adrenal glands, two eyeballs or testes and an inner lining with a distinct curvy nodular form that is seen in many a inner lining of a mucus membrane maxing out surface area not just the uvula. I think the Czech interpretation is correct to strongly consider this though it is not the first.
I see Latinistic elements and I will not get into full specifics of what I have found so far as the project is still on going and only in the early stages. A lot is done but it is a big project. There are also strong indications of Asiatic elements which includes Onion Domes, upside down T and O maps and of course a Pangolin. Some of the faces seem to show a slight Asiatic Admixture. I've seen two dimensions in the text of external influences. This might not tell you as much as you think but there are two major discernible vectors. One goes through the Eastern Mediterranean down to Egypt (Syriac seems central stretching down to Kushite and also with an influence on Arabic) and the other takes a quite long journey roughly over the top of the Black Sea to the Caspian via central Asia or North India all the way down to the Philippines if not further. These do not necessarily impact the same thing in the text. One vector seems to be more similar to the script rather than the spoken language in it and the other more familiar with the spoken language.
The research has not yet separated this from ancient flows but it does seat the manuscript among certain languages or cultures in Europe with foreign influence. You'll see something similar with other European languages. If you consider Indo-European for example there will be odd correlations with language going quite deep toward the Indian Subcontinent and it seems to show similar relations. Some of it however so far seems a bit stronger than normal. You have to be careful with this as there are likely spurious matches. The text does something weird which I currently assume to be encoding that very remote Island languages happen to do which is to like to do things like turn the word ban into banana. I would be doubtful of an interpretation that is too localised. It's likely either one of the authors travelled or they are influenced by a lot of foreign literature that they are in possession off. I suspect a possible Chinese Whispers issue and the information in the manuscript to have bounced around a fair bit making it hard to place. In this era the Muslims had taken a lot of these texts prior and then we had taken them back with layers of foreign influences. I would be sceptical of a linguistic pattern that is pure straight Latin without some other influences or that does not somehow explain the seemingly foreign and by that I mean remote elements in the book. If there is a true language in it of meaning ad not just made from random jumbled up bits of language then I would expect it to likely be somewhat informal or colloquial albeit a bit of a mix. Regardless, the text has a very high probability of being derived from something that bounced around the Islamic world and that in turn was derived from the frontier of their crusades and the literature they captured from Greece, Egypt and India to then be recaptured and presumably Latinised and Germanised to some degree or similar. I find any interpretation that does not reflect this surprising.