14-07-2025, 08:45 AM
I goofed and lost a posting. I wanted to get this saved.
The first "what's really there on the vellum" challenge was LAAFU, the
unexplained position in line effects. Emma May Smith's recap is good:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
She's a favorite of mine. Her English word flow is like her reasoning.
The second thing is not something that I actually saw before it was pointed
out to me. This is the rigid internal structure inside each word. This is a serious
thing and it reduces the entropy a lot. Oh, Eirikur on entropy: I call it Shannon information or
carrying capacity. At this point in my journey I did some calculations and got a very
rough number of two bits per glyph. For a direct to dictionary model to work, I think you need
about six bits to define a European letter. So, that makes this a pretty labor intensive operation
for quill-pen users, doable of course, but strange. Someone did a more convincing bits analysis and got 1.6 bits per glyph. That's really tough to work with. I bet it's true, but I hope not. I'm exposing my personal biases here, but I don't trust them. I need to prove things. I'm good at being wrong.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The first "what's really there on the vellum" challenge was LAAFU, the
unexplained position in line effects. Emma May Smith's recap is good:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
She's a favorite of mine. Her English word flow is like her reasoning.
The second thing is not something that I actually saw before it was pointed
out to me. This is the rigid internal structure inside each word. This is a serious
thing and it reduces the entropy a lot. Oh, Eirikur on entropy: I call it Shannon information or
carrying capacity. At this point in my journey I did some calculations and got a very
rough number of two bits per glyph. For a direct to dictionary model to work, I think you need
about six bits to define a European letter. So, that makes this a pretty labor intensive operation
for quill-pen users, doable of course, but strange. Someone did a more convincing bits analysis and got 1.6 bits per glyph. That's really tough to work with. I bet it's true, but I hope not. I'm exposing my personal biases here, but I don't trust them. I need to prove things. I'm good at being wrong.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)