I've deciphered the Voynich Manuscript. Here is the alphabet of the manuscript

[Michael Obraztsov]

Why do you think my decision is clearly wrong?

The details you describe can only be clarified by translating a lot of pages, and this takes time. I wish that until I had time to translate a lot, my work was appreciated for the high percentage of text recognition, if such a percentage is a record.

If you are not ready to put more effort into understanding the critiques or providing a stronger argument, it's strange to expect other people to appreciate your work. 

I said what's wrong with your approach in my very first post on this topic. Anyone can achieve 100% of "text recognition" using the same method. It's trivial and I think it's a waste of time.

---

So what about other people's records regarding the percentage of recognized text? You don't know?

There is one universally accepted record - and it's 0%. It was first achieved by Newbold in the 1920s and to this day I don't think it has been beaten.

If it's trivial - prove it's trivial. Translate the same text that I translated, for example, into the same three languages, with no less recognition percentage than I did. Use a different alphabet. I'll see how you do. Or, do the same for any three other languages with your alphabet.
It is very easy to throw unfounded accusations, but I recommend that you try to put this into practice. I put it into practice. If it's easy, put it into practice. By this you will prove your case to me and many others so that in the future they do not waste time trying to make a translation from three languages. This is a matter of principle. As long as you assert without evidence, your arguments will remain only unfounded accusations.

As for my "unwillingness to make more efforts," what makes you think that I am not ready to make these efforts? I wrote not about this, but about recognizing what I had already achieved: recognizing the maximum percentage of words based on my alphabet. You don't have scientific thinking at all if you don't see a correlation between an increase in the percentage of recognized words and an increase in the likelihood that the correct algorithm has been selected. There is a direct probabilistic relationship. Do you understand what factor analysis is and the probability of correct decisions depending on the percentage of identical results of solving the problem? I repeat: if, as you say, to achieve my results on the basis of three languages is a banal thing, then achieve such results. Not just for me, but for everyone else. It won't take you years, and even months, if you're right. I managed in a matter of days.