I've deciphered the Voynich Manuscript. Here is the alphabet of the manuscript

[Michael Obraztsov]

About the unoriginality. Why talk in hints? If you are aware of the unoriginality of my case, could you point out exactly where my approach coincides with other people's approaches?

Of course, I understood what you didn't translate. However, you have made the argument that it is easy to combine anything with anything. I answered you with a counterargument: if it's easy, let's delve into this question. My solution is quite clear. If you think it's easy to do something like this, try it. Then please provide the alphabet, as I did.

This is not a tournament of solutions. If you want your solution to be seriously considered, it's up to you to provide a persuasive argument as to why your solution is any good. Since there so far has been little interest towards your solution, your argument is obviously not strong enough for other people. It doesn't matter what you think yourself about your solution, it can only be accepted if other people find it good. 

There are many ways to make your argument stronger, but you have to do this before you can expect other people to spend any serious effort on proving or disproving your case.

If you indeed can read the manuscript, you can easily make your argument stronger. For example, you can find some specific information about the author or the locations in the text. You can find if the manuscript references or quotes any other works. You can identify the proper title of the manuscript to check whether is was referenced in other contemporary works. You can find some specific local words which could help to pinpoint where the author was from.

---

By the way, can you tell me someone who can organize a quick calculation of the percentage of recognized words from the Voynich manuscript using special programs based on my alphabet?

I think a person who has deciphered the Voynich Manuscript can certainly solve this minor problem.

Of course, he can solve it. But not everything depends on the brain of such a person. A lot also depends on the circumstances of the environment. The circumstances are such that if I do all this myself, I will need to both spend time earning money for this, and spend time looking for ways to implement this idea, as well as finding people who will confirm my correctness.

And you're pouring out your anger, just like in one chat where they also hated me. It looks like you're from there.

---

About the unoriginality. Why talk in hints? If you are aware of the unoriginality of my case, could you point out exactly where my approach coincides with other people's approaches?

Of course, I understood what you didn't translate. However, you have made the argument that it is easy to combine anything with anything. I answered you with a counterargument: if it's easy, let's delve into this question. My solution is quite clear. If you think it's easy to do something like this, try it. Then please provide the alphabet, as I did.

This is not a tournament of solutions. If you want your solution to be seriously considered, it's up to you to provide a persuasive argument as to why your solution is any good. Since there so far has been little interest towards your solution, your argument is obviously not strong enough for other people. It doesn't matter what you think yourself about your solution, it can only be accepted if other people find it good. 

There are many ways to make your argument stronger, but you have to do this before you can expect other people to spend any serious effort on proving or disproving your case.

If you indeed can read the manuscript, you can easily make your argument stronger. For example, you can find some specific information about the author or the locations in the text. You can find if the manuscript references or quotes any other works. You can identify the proper title of the manuscript to check whether is was referenced in other contemporary works. You can find some specific local words which could help to pinpoint where the author was from.

---

By the way, can you tell me someone who can organize a quick calculation of the percentage of recognized words from the Voynich manuscript using special programs based on my alphabet?

I think a person who has deciphered the Voynich Manuscript can certainly solve this minor problem.

Are you toxic