I've deciphered the Voynich Manuscript. Here is the alphabet of the manuscript

[Michael Obraztsov]

As I've shown in this You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., using a mix of words from different languages you can create a somewhat meaningful text from almost any combination of characters. So, from my point of view you haven't decrypted any part of the Voynich Manuscript and to me the lack of interest in your solution is totally expected.

Could you introduce me to the algorithm of your translation? Arguments are reasoned when they can be verified based on the alphabet. For example, in that post, what is the alphabet? Could you show it to me? And how many languages are involved there? I use only three languages, and this is fully justified, since this practice was widespread at that time in medieval England. How many languages do you use? Thirty? There's a huge difference between three and thirty.