07-07-2025, 08:27 PM
Statistics:
The probability of a random match for 70%+ words tends to zero. For example:
If we take 100 random combinations of 5-6 characters,
The chance that >70 will match the actual words of a particular language,
It is <0.0001% for any European language of the 15th century.
In the information provided here You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. the article matches 75%.
Could you tell me the reason for your indifference to my version? Is it just that everyone is convinced that they are right, which is why they don't pay attention to other options? Or perhaps the intrigue surrounding the Voynich manuscript is a banal marketing ploy to attract visitors to the library where the manuscript is kept, and to increase the prestige of programmer competitions for whose program will select the best code, thanks to which not 30% of the text will be "deciphered", but 35%, and many before me have already achieved results. not worse than mine?
For me, this is not an idle curiosity, but an existentially significant question. I am a very smart person who lived in poverty from childhood until adulthood without the Internet. Recognizing my interpretation as appropriate is paying attention to my intelligence, which will make me in demand in various scientific projects, which I really want.
Of course, I'm not pretending here that just because of my statements, I'm being treated as if everything has already been confirmed. But I think a visual demonstration of 75% of the words corresponding to dictionaries based on my interpretation is at least enough for discussion and criticism if I am wrong, or reasoned arguments pointing to my wrongness. I invite you to discuss this issue.
The probability of a random match for 70%+ words tends to zero. For example:
If we take 100 random combinations of 5-6 characters,
The chance that >70 will match the actual words of a particular language,
It is <0.0001% for any European language of the 15th century.
In the information provided here You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. the article matches 75%.
Could you tell me the reason for your indifference to my version? Is it just that everyone is convinced that they are right, which is why they don't pay attention to other options? Or perhaps the intrigue surrounding the Voynich manuscript is a banal marketing ploy to attract visitors to the library where the manuscript is kept, and to increase the prestige of programmer competitions for whose program will select the best code, thanks to which not 30% of the text will be "deciphered", but 35%, and many before me have already achieved results. not worse than mine?
For me, this is not an idle curiosity, but an existentially significant question. I am a very smart person who lived in poverty from childhood until adulthood without the Internet. Recognizing my interpretation as appropriate is paying attention to my intelligence, which will make me in demand in various scientific projects, which I really want.
Of course, I'm not pretending here that just because of my statements, I'm being treated as if everything has already been confirmed. But I think a visual demonstration of 75% of the words corresponding to dictionaries based on my interpretation is at least enough for discussion and criticism if I am wrong, or reasoned arguments pointing to my wrongness. I invite you to discuss this issue.