I've deciphered the Voynich Manuscript. Here is the alphabet of the manuscript

[Michael Obraztsov]

Hello Michael!
I'd like to make a few comments about your results.
1. Are you aware that there are several transcriptions of this manuscript? Using a known transcription would save you from including word images in your document, except, of course, when it's absolutely essential.
2. In addition to Archive.org, there are other sources of manuscript images that are easier to open and download.
3. On this forum, there have been suggestions for presenting the results; I quote from memory: transcription / your reading / smoothed translation.
4. This VM translation adventure can help you learn how to write: include a title, the author's name, the date, etc., and follow the classic outline: introduction, methodology, results, discussion, REFERENCES.
This way, whatever your translation successes, it won't be wasted time.

1. Of course I know about Voynich fonts. I use EVA myself. I just decided to express it through direct images, just in case. Besides, I'm not sure if the font will be displayed here on the site. Is it too important that I choose the font or something else?
2. You recommend giving me links. But I did give the links in the attached PDF file. What's the problem here?
3. Against the background of the fact that I deciphered the manuscript, it hardly matters to me whether I expressed it in font or through screenshots. May I ask if statements about the coincidence of 75% of words, supported by evidence, are often published on this site, as I did? As far as I know, Cheshire showed the best result before me with 44 percent. Am I wrong? Maybe the intrigue around the Voynich manuscript is a banal marketing ploy to attract visitors to the library where the manuscript is kept, and to increase the prestige of programmer competitions for whose program will select the best code, thanks to which 35% of the text will be "deciphered" instead of 30%?