Critique wanted

[kckluge]

EVA is just a tool, use the right tool for the right job.
If the craftsman cannot distinguish between a hacksaw and a woodsaw why blame the saw ?

Well, let's do an experiment. The other full-mss-based-on-hi-res-scans transcription is Glen Claston's using his v101 transcription scheme -- how many decipherment proposals of the type we have here can you point to that use that transcription and start by assuming "1oe" (the v101 equivalent of EVA "chol") or "og1c89" (the most likely/common v101 equivalent of "opchedy") reflect the actual phonetic values of the script? How many do you think we'd have seen over the years if EVA "opchedy" was "opctc89" instead? Sorry, but at some point it's fair to hold poor design of the tool at least partly at fault.