Critique wanted

[KJ now]

So are you trying to match and map the EVA transcription (e.g. "otedy shedy") to other languages based on similarities, or was that just an example? Because if so, that'd undermine the whole thing IMO

Hey, totally fair question and I appreciatethe thoughtful pushback. Also, love the glyph on your profile. I ran it through our POLER-D framework, and it seems to say “it is Sacred word” or “the essence is declared”. Would that be an accurate interpretation on your end?

To your main point though, we don’t just match EVA glyphs to other languages by surface similarity. That would undermine everything. What we’re doing instead with POLER-D is:

Phonetic drift modeling across post 1300 phonetic languages. EVA> phoneme groups> Latin>English

Consistent syllable parsing, guided by diachronic sound rules (exampl: how "k" > "ch" > "sh" in Germanic/Slavic shifts)

Latin as a neutral anchor. It helps maintain structure and limits cherry picking
AI implementation, now that our parameters are set, every line goes through the same system without guesswork or intuition. That removes confirmation bias from the equation.
When ritualistic or botanical patterns show up across multiple unrelated folios, we’re not projecting meaning, we’re surfacing it.

Let me know what you think. I’m always open to better ways of testing this system.