The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[oshfdk]

Perhaps, but it's a bit extreme. Why would they want to:

- Omit all e on two random pages: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f36r.

- Concentrate some patterns on some pages and omit them in an entire section, for example You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. has a lot of [e:h]od, [e:h]os: 14 eod, 3 hod, 2 eos, 1 hos. No [e:h]or, [e:h]ol, -eo. It is the opposite of Q13, but both are Currier language B. There are many examples of extreme concentrations and total absence of common patterns on many pages.

I have no in-universe answer for this (I mean the Reader-Author-Scribe plot), but out-of-universe these are simple. I'm a happy follower of "it's a cipher" cult, so different cipher keys cause different glyph sequences. There was nothing assigned to e on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. or f36r, so no e was recorded. And f57v is an oddity in itself.