11-05-2025, 03:01 AM
Bluetoes,
This isn’t a fly by the seat of my pants theory. I’ve published a repeatable method that anyone can test visually. No glyphs, no translation assumptions. You have not even given me the courtesy of looking at my previous responses where I admit the labeling of Otor/Otar was off and I explained why. Here is what can be done….You can take any circular folio like f70v1, f67r2, or f69r, classify figures or segments by gesture, orientation, or structure into four visual phases (Passive, Active, Transitional, Neutral), and then look for repeating phase arcs or quarter-based breaks.
That’s the claim. Not meaning, not language, just observable structure. And yes, in folios like f70v1 and f67r2, Neutral phases consistently fall at 10, 15, 21, and 29 out of 30, dividing the cycle into quarters. That’s either intentional or a statistical fluke worth testing.
I fully agree that image labeling can involve some subjectivity. One viewer might call a gesture “invoking,” another might see it as “static.” That’s why the classification system is important. It gives a defined framework:
Also worth noting this may be the first fully testable Voynich theory ever published. You don’t need credentials, software, or decoding tools. You just need your eyes and the scans. That alone should merit at least a genuine test. If it fails, that’s valuable. But if it passes, even partially, it may shift how we look at the manuscript entirely.
I’ve also posted a full prompt guide and worksheets so others can replicate the analysis. If someone tests the method and gets different results, I’m open to that. But writing it off without engaging the method isn’t falsifying it. It’s avoiding it.
If this theory breaks under pressure, great. But if the structure holds, maybe it’s worth asking why. I am disheartened by how rude and mean you have been to me however and I hope others are open minded enough to give it a chance.
Replication Folder
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
This isn’t a fly by the seat of my pants theory. I’ve published a repeatable method that anyone can test visually. No glyphs, no translation assumptions. You have not even given me the courtesy of looking at my previous responses where I admit the labeling of Otor/Otar was off and I explained why. Here is what can be done….You can take any circular folio like f70v1, f67r2, or f69r, classify figures or segments by gesture, orientation, or structure into four visual phases (Passive, Active, Transitional, Neutral), and then look for repeating phase arcs or quarter-based breaks.
That’s the claim. Not meaning, not language, just observable structure. And yes, in folios like f70v1 and f67r2, Neutral phases consistently fall at 10, 15, 21, and 29 out of 30, dividing the cycle into quarters. That’s either intentional or a statistical fluke worth testing.
I fully agree that image labeling can involve some subjectivity. One viewer might call a gesture “invoking,” another might see it as “static.” That’s why the classification system is important. It gives a defined framework:
- Passive: Stillness, grounding, rest
- Active: Outward gesture, offering, invocation
- Transitional: Turning, stepping, entering/leaving
- Neutral: Symmetry, reset, structural pause
Also worth noting this may be the first fully testable Voynich theory ever published. You don’t need credentials, software, or decoding tools. You just need your eyes and the scans. That alone should merit at least a genuine test. If it fails, that’s valuable. But if it passes, even partially, it may shift how we look at the manuscript entirely.
I’ve also posted a full prompt guide and worksheets so others can replicate the analysis. If someone tests the method and gets different results, I’m open to that. But writing it off without engaging the method isn’t falsifying it. It’s avoiding it.
If this theory breaks under pressure, great. But if the structure holds, maybe it’s worth asking why. I am disheartened by how rude and mean you have been to me however and I hope others are open minded enough to give it a chance.
Replication Folder
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
