A method I have made to translate the Voynich/chiper text

[project963]

Could you identify grammar structures in your reconstruction? For example:

1) Do adjectives precede or follow the nouns? ("green leaf" or "leaf green")
2) Do verbs precede or follow the subject? ("plant grows" or "grows plant")
3) Do objects precede of follow the verb? ("take the root" or "the root take")
4) Sorting order of adjectives? ("small old green leaf" or "old green small leaf", etc.)

This might help in identifying the language family.

These questions are on the border of my competence as I have limited linguistic education. Please remember that this project should be considered as a basic model setup. Grammar etc. should be somewhat secondary, at least in the initial phase. But I can keep this in mind as it relevant and I understand the value.

But notice that I have change old/newer etc. with a new group of words: valuable ISH.

The other issue I have is that the text seems to play tricks as I unfold the basic grammar; like when I discovered direction words like "middel/topp/bottom" etc. it later showed that it was not 100% as the right grammar was LOOK "middle/topp/bottom" etc. Yes its appears almost the same but not. 

I have also found a trick in the left bottom part if 85v where you see a circle with a triangle inside. The first to words are "circle (form)" + "triangle". Yes it's not a real sentence but for me it looks like word + word sentence.

These thing makes me personally more and more humbled for the deeps of this language that will be discovered later

Today I will finish translating the 10th folio. I will then do more translation words tests for the next days. That should give some new knowledge and maybe new subcategories.

Sometimes I feel that the language is so bizarre that it could be a version of what the old testament mentions as the universal language of old Babylon. Yes something so easy that anyone can understand it once you learned the basics. But that's just a crazy idea with no proof I guess