11-02-2025, 05:21 AM
(11-02-2025, 12:35 AM)tavie wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view."Why is my solution better than any of those on the list? Why is it different?"
All the solutions on that list contain different systems, spread out across at least 25 different languages. But they're also all the same. This is because they:
- fail to produce text that could be reproduced by anyone else (too many choices for a glyph)
- fail to produce text that seems to have coherent syntax in the target language
- fail to explain the strange, unlanguage-like behaviour of Voynichese
My solution is the truth.
Using the same symbols I have translations of 116v; plants part too (which I will publish in my blog later). I have a translation of f1r- of which no other has a reasonable one yet.
Concerning to the first point- (too many choices for a glyph) This point should be removed from your standards of validation.
Because this is the heart of the coding of the Manuscript. Some symbols are with more possibilities. As "8" - may be "v" and maybe "b"; "r" may be "r", but maybe "n". "P" too, etc.
Here is fair to mention that it maybe not a target of the coding, but a way be that someone has copied unknown for this scriber symbols. I am not certain if this is not a writing skill failure.
What coherency you expect in a chart with names of the stars? There is provided a parallel with other tables of Picatrix, Star Names, Arabic Magic etc.
Voynecese is a very language-like language and this point is fantasy to be provided for a criteria.
Thank you for including me in your solutions list!
It is better to be registered there, than ignored.
Note- there are words in the manuscript from 4 Languages. It is not only Czech Moravian. Star names are Arabic. Some of the medical terms are German and there is a forth language too.
br: Vessy