15-01-2025, 08:39 PM
(15-01-2025, 07:34 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
So, I'm not sure why should we assume that images are derived from some other work.
What should be the default assumption for a medieval work? Most of the imagery comes from somewhere . It's exactly the details that change. Even a hunter's bow becoming a crossbow is considered a change in fashion rather than type.
Just compare the two doctor illustrations in the remaining manuscripts of this tradition (Berlin and Karlsruhe). Would they be placed on the same family tree by your standards?