- Options
- Login
- Desktop Style
Options
f57v figures
- f57v figures
-
RE: f57v figures
Bluetoes101 > 05-12-2025, 10:36 PM
-
RE: f57v figures
JoJo_Jost > 05-12-2025, 11:09 PM
(05-12-2025, 10:36 PM)Bluetoes101 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There is another text thread on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The cipher chats taking this one a bit off-topic from "imagery"
Also welcome yinyang2024
, I'm not sure but the answer might be Gimp
@ Bluetoes - Sorry, I didn't mean to. But the post was about the significance of the nymphs' arms. So as a reference a structure, in this case a cipher / Circle. It wouldn't have fit in the text thread because it didn't work.
@yinyang2024 I use paint.net but with a plug-in called “Arc txt” by Velarde. -
RE: f57v figures
Bluetoes101 > 05-12-2025, 11:24 PM
Its ok (you didn't start it tbf ), its just that I think the image bit of the question is interesting, and the thread was going a bit "in the weeds"
We think we have a decent idea of f86v4 images (below), and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f86v4 poses seem to be a bit spookily similar.. so did they just reuse these poses? Or is there a better match out there? If they were using "stretched arm guy" template for both, it might explain why stick and rosary beads figure got a bit.. crazy.
Don't know, but its an interesting question and consideration I think
-
RE: f57v figures
anejati > 06-12-2025, 05:58 AM
(05-12-2025, 11:24 PM)Bluetoes101 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Its ok (you didn't start it tbf
), its just that I think the image bit of the question is interesting, and the thread was going a bit "in the weeds"
We think we have a decent idea of f86v4 images (below), and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f86v4 poses seem to be a bit spookily similar.. so did they just reuse these poses? Or is there a better match out there? If they were using "stretched arm guy" template for both, it might explain why stick and rosary beads figure got a bit.. crazy.
Don't know, but its an interesting question and consideration I think
That does seem very similar to f86v4. Was this discussed on another thread?
As for the connection between You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f86v4. To my eyes it seems there are some big differences so I don't agree with Stolfi here. The orientation of the faces is different, the arm poses are different, and the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. figures don't seem to be holding anything except for one figure. It is true that both contain 4 figures in a circle, so that's something in common.
petervank: That is certainly an original idea. -
RE: f57v figures
Bluetoes101 > 06-12-2025, 09:32 PM
Whoops sorry
, just to be clear I only meant "poses" not that the actual images are alike.
High five!
-
RE: f57v figures
anejati > 06-12-2025, 11:00 PM
Thank you! -
RE: f57v figures
davidma > 07-12-2025, 05:11 PM
Hi, while on the topic of f57v's imagery, I found this a while ago while looking at swiss manuscripts.
I don't think I have seen that "floral" motif at the centre with the compass hole before. It is from cod. sang. 756. The words arrangement is also similar, f9 cod. sang 756 has the 4 humors (I can make out flegma and colera, the others should be sanguin and melanc), You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. in the "same" positions has "otodaram" for colera and "olkeedal" for flegma, the other two being "otardaly" and "ofarairdly". Maybe it's a coincidence, maybe not. I can't remember where but someone else had linked You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. with the 4 humours.
