17-09-2016, 10:08 PM
Just talking philosophically, I must agree that there is *something* about conspiracy theories that makes them hard to tolerate, more so than your average Voynich theory. Often you'll see a person who clearly spent a lot of time and effort on a clearly flawed theory. There's nothing wrong with that, they tried honestly, perhaps learned a few things, might improve their methodology...
But this is different, though I can't quite put my finger on it. There's a certain deliberateness to it.
Ah well. To each his own. Based on the imagery alone, I can absolutely exclude the possibility of a forgery.
Unless in the case that original documents were copied by the forger, and even then the chance is, like Rene explained, extremely small. And someone also made the very valid remark that such original documents would be many times more valuable than an impossible-to-understand forgery. There is just nothing that points that way.
But this is different, though I can't quite put my finger on it. There's a certain deliberateness to it.
Ah well. To each his own. Based on the imagery alone, I can absolutely exclude the possibility of a forgery.
Unless in the case that original documents were copied by the forger, and even then the chance is, like Rene explained, extremely small. And someone also made the very valid remark that such original documents would be many times more valuable than an impossible-to-understand forgery. There is just nothing that points that way.