24-06-2024, 09:53 PM
@Koen
For me, first the "m" was with or without an "e", and then the "m" was overwritten with a "d". I note height "l", it is not where it should be.
Maybe you still remember the mistake "nim Gott / min Gott"
New speculation.
What if it's not an "m" at all, but an "in".
"into something"
With an "e" added, it would be "ine" Alemannic form of "hinein".
De nail mues ine. The nail must go in.
Used a thousand times by children. "Und Du gasch ine" And you go in"
The sentence wouldn't be quite correct. It's missing an "es". Correct, "Und den muss (es) ine"
This would explain Marco's picture in a nutshell.
For me, first the "m" was with or without an "e", and then the "m" was overwritten with a "d". I note height "l", it is not where it should be.
Maybe you still remember the mistake "nim Gott / min Gott"
New speculation.
What if it's not an "m" at all, but an "in".
"into something"
With an "e" added, it would be "ine" Alemannic form of "hinein".
De nail mues ine. The nail must go in.
Used a thousand times by children. "Und Du gasch ine" And you go in"
The sentence wouldn't be quite correct. It's missing an "es". Correct, "Und den muss (es) ine"
This would explain Marco's picture in a nutshell.