Well, that's a beauty! Great provenance. Thanks for the translation. As noted, it's a third variation for planetary placement in relation to the signs of the zodiac "along astrological lines" - shall we say. Whether it's a 'Sacrobosco' or not depends on the definition. Is there a preferable alternative to be found in the Cod. sang? It's a cosmos.
What is the original 'Sacrobosco'? It seems pretty minimalist to me. Just names of the planets in a vertical stack to specify their orbits, without symbols or numbers and without a zodiac cycle. Those things were added and combined in various ways. And with these additional elements, different patterns of planetary distribution were being set forth. I believe I read in one of the Springer articles that, in contrast to Sacrobosco's texts in the post-printing era, the pre-printing era was not that well documented. If there's more data available (1400-1450+), this could be interesting.
Does the 4-1-1-1 pattern have an earlier origin?
PS: The writing is also interesting; the 'r' and the '9' in Aquarius. I still get hung up on planet Veng.
And another thing to be noted is that this zodiac sequence is clockwise.
What is the original 'Sacrobosco'? It seems pretty minimalist to me. Just names of the planets in a vertical stack to specify their orbits, without symbols or numbers and without a zodiac cycle. Those things were added and combined in various ways. And with these additional elements, different patterns of planetary distribution were being set forth. I believe I read in one of the Springer articles that, in contrast to Sacrobosco's texts in the post-printing era, the pre-printing era was not that well documented. If there's more data available (1400-1450+), this could be interesting.
Does the 4-1-1-1 pattern have an earlier origin?
PS: The writing is also interesting; the 'r' and the '9' in Aquarius. I still get hung up on planet Veng.
And another thing to be noted is that this zodiac sequence is clockwise.