Voynich decoded completely

[Scarecrow]

I think he interpretation of linguisttic and cryptanalytic results as everything from Kisuahili to Mandarin indicates that something is fundamentally wrong, but I am neither a l. nor a c. but a philologist and historian (Middle Ages)

Well maybe not fundamentally wrong, except maybe in our thinking.
What it says to me, at least, is that what we see is in the manuscript not a language, but a result of an encoding/transformation method of sorts, and we are just looking properties of the results of it, not the language/information it is concealing and properties and results we see, seem to indicate that the encoding method/process is quite generic and could encode anything with it, any language that is, wheter invented or real one.

What I find interesting iin the method is that the quite strict positionality possibly seems to indicate some kind of encoder grammar with/in it.