Voynich decoded completely

[MarcoP]

Since you are so fond of Latin you'll be delighted to know that your first argument is a "non sequitur" and your second argument an "ad personam".

No, it does not.
You simply ignore the instructions.
You can decide. Yes, they are all the same, or no, they are different. That alone changes a lot.

The fact that there are uncertainties in transliteration is well known.

E.g. "How Many Glyphs and How Many Scribes?" Lisa Fagin Davis, Manuscript Studies, 2020:

It is important to at least acknowledge the question underlying the distinction between EVA, v101, and other transcription systems: How many distinct characters are there in Voynichese? It is not entirely obvious.

"Transliteration of the Voynich MS text", Rene Zandbergen, Malta conference, 2022:

there is a significant amount of variation in the character shapes. It is often difficult to decide if two similar, yet different shapes are different characters or just handwriting variations.

From this known fact it does not follow (non sequitur) that Latin is a better explanation for the fragment you posted than any other language.

What are your insights into the text?

This is also 100% irrelevant. Questioning people's personal contributions (ad personam) has nothing to do with proving that Latin is better than any other language. It's the same argument that Rene mentioned above: "I should not be 'preaching' because I have not solved it, so I don't know. ... It is a good conversation stopper.".