The 1502 edition listing references the Leipzig printers Landsberg and Kachelofen.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Same cosmic pattern, slightly different printed text. Also has labels.
Here is another example: 1516 Nürnberg
Sphera materialis
Nürnberg: Iobst Gutknecht, 1516
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
So, not all German editions were using the same pattern of planetary arrangement. Not seeing an astrological connections here either.
While it is possible to put all the planets in their primary houses, that does not create the 'four in a row' pattern. Meanwhile, the Leipzig editions have the desired pattern, but they are from the end of the 15th century and early 16th, rather than in the first half of the 15th. We'll see what else turns up.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Same cosmic pattern, slightly different printed text. Also has labels.
Here is another example: 1516 Nürnberg
Sphera materialis
Nürnberg: Iobst Gutknecht, 1516
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
So, not all German editions were using the same pattern of planetary arrangement. Not seeing an astrological connections here either.
While it is possible to put all the planets in their primary houses, that does not create the 'four in a row' pattern. Meanwhile, the Leipzig editions have the desired pattern, but they are from the end of the 15th century and early 16th, rather than in the first half of the 15th. We'll see what else turns up.

