116v

[Anton]

Thx Marco,

This list would be better examined by an expert in Middle High German (whom we've long been trying to invoke, but yet to no avail).

I'd suggest to take into account that "u" and "v" may be interchangeable, so e.g. for your option "vvtprer" actually four options should be formally considered:

• uutprer
  
• uvtprer
  
• vutprer
  
• vvtprer
  

However, taking Koen's resonable remark into account, we could leave only

• uvtprer
  
• vutprer
  

because two "u"'s or two "v"'s in a single word would look the same indeed.

Regarding Helmut's reading, it's quite tempting , but I join Marco in his question of whether the grammar is OK. And also is "pmm" a valid abbreviation?

I would add that tracing all the possible meanings against Woerterbuchnetz is quite cumbersome, because one word usually has not only many meanings, but also many variations with many meanings. E.g. you open word 1, it says see word 2 and word 3, and so on...

---

Another incantation from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
It is mostly German, so I can't read it. But the Latin is:

...German... rax pax fax ++++ in xpo [christo] + filio + da=
vid ...German . . . appolo[n]ia .....
..... ave ma[r]ia

The "rax pax fax" could parallel "six+marix+movix+vix" in line 3.

Look at the beginning of the German portion.

It reads:

?????? den zant schwen schraib (or schrais, not sure) an daz wag mit aine hutte...

But what is this character?