From the example given (first line of f9r):
tydlo choly cThor orchey
The equivalence of 1-3 letters (similar to EVA letters with confusion of e, c, h) to a plaintext word is a compression; it goes in the wrong direction relative to entropy and word length. The process is like pulling a large rabbit out of a small hat.
Sure, it can be done, but does the result look credible when the same words are repeated on nearly each line, often several times? The ungrammatical word salad is then interpreted and still makes little sense.
tydlo choly cThor orchey
Google translation wrote:Approximate transcription using letters from the PC keyboard:
Hq8ᴥo ccoᴥq cHcoƆ oƆcccq
Cluster grouping with breakdown into individual words and translation:
Hq 8 ᴥo:
Hq - effort
8 – he, she, it, they, them
ᴥo – a gift
cco ᴥq:
cco - this, this, this
ᴥq – report
cHc oƆ:
cHc – occupy
oƆ – assembly
oƆ cc cq:
oƆ – assembly
cc – to act
cq – to decide
Stylized translation: "The effort with the gift, this proclamation, to occupy the assembly, to make a decision with the assembly..."
The equivalence of 1-3 letters (similar to EVA letters with confusion of e, c, h) to a plaintext word is a compression; it goes in the wrong direction relative to entropy and word length. The process is like pulling a large rabbit out of a small hat.
Sure, it can be done, but does the result look credible when the same words are repeated on nearly each line, often several times? The ungrammatical word salad is then interpreted and still makes little sense.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)