25-08-2022, 11:14 PM
(25-08-2022, 04:30 PM)cvetkakocj@rogers.com wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Both Czeck 'translators' fail this test, since they offer no intermediate steps to show how they substituted the VM text with their own creation which they claim to be a translation of a particular real author's work.
In my opinion to claim that you deciphered or translated the manuscript without showing the step-by-step process nor the results for others to review is a bit suspicious. It's like hanging on to a solution that you don't want anyone to disprove nor criticize because it might fall apart. So many have claimed to have translated it in many different ways and languages and they cannot all be right. So I ask each one of them: How can you be so sure that you are right and everyone else is mistaken?
(25-08-2022, 04:30 PM)cvetkakocj@rogers.com wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Why would they write in code, if they were transmitting God's messages intended for all people on earth? [...] As a Tridentine bishop, he would not use some complicated code to share that with people.
This is also a point that looks somewhat inconsistent. Irena says that he first part about plants it more like a private diary about the authors feelings and emotions and that each plant represents these. Then later on [the author] describes his encounter with God or something along those lines in the astrological section.
It's very uncommon or rather odd that an old manuscript which is very expensive and time consuming to produce was meant to be just some sort of secret private diary or account or personal happenings that was not supposed to be read by no one else. Is there any record of a full manuscript from that era to be produced to conceal private secrets rather than to share important knowledge? I am no expert in the field but I'd think this to be very unlikely.
Even the fact of encoding your own text for it to be unreadable for anyone else the fact that you are writing it down is because you plan to be able to access its contents yourself. According to Irena the translation of each page is so time consuming (up to days or weeks) and cannot be done without the help of the image (I don't know what she refers to here) so I wonder of what use is such a strong encoding that it would take yourself incredibly long to be able to read your own information whenever you need to access it.

