01-08-2022, 11:26 PM
PS to your #20
As I said, others have made the Goden Fleece interpretation early on regarding f80v. An identification made without benefit, or even the identification of the nebuly line and the underlying droplets. These confirm the VMs critter as a representation of the Agnus Dei following the particular, three-part structural pattern: 1] critter / 2] cosmic boundary (nebuly line) / 3] droplets (of blood) found in BNF Fr. 13096 f. 18. An older manuscript that was later in the Burgundy library.
The other potential interpretation of the Golden Fleece is with the VMs mermaid of f79v. And if the VMs mermaid is Melusine of Luxembourg, then *both* representations share in the Valois connection even though that connection may have gotten lost along the way. Melusine and the Burgundy Valois connection are validated in the historical description of the Feast of the Pheasant.
As I said, others have made the Goden Fleece interpretation early on regarding f80v. An identification made without benefit, or even the identification of the nebuly line and the underlying droplets. These confirm the VMs critter as a representation of the Agnus Dei following the particular, three-part structural pattern: 1] critter / 2] cosmic boundary (nebuly line) / 3] droplets (of blood) found in BNF Fr. 13096 f. 18. An older manuscript that was later in the Burgundy library.
The other potential interpretation of the Golden Fleece is with the VMs mermaid of f79v. And if the VMs mermaid is Melusine of Luxembourg, then *both* representations share in the Valois connection even though that connection may have gotten lost along the way. Melusine and the Burgundy Valois connection are validated in the historical description of the Feast of the Pheasant.