08-11-2021, 03:01 PM
(22-10-2021, 08:21 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Indeed, Nablator. I'm sorry Maria, but you really can't use Cappelli to read this manuscript, even on f. 116v. Your interpretations of the letterforms are incorrect, and so your abbreviation expansions are also incorrect.
Sorry but you have misunderstood my work, I never use Cappelli to read this manuscript, I only used it to compare some diacritical signs commonly used during the XV century for the missing letters.
The manuscript presents a latin version under the more evident calligraphy, probably the draft was made with a lead point or with nerofumo ink.
I didn't invent anything.