The Voynich manuscript decoding method proposal by Maria Rita Lunazzi

[Maria Rita Lunazzi]

Inoltre, nell'alfabeto EVA i glifi sono troppo standardizzati.

Per es. Non tiene conto delle varie curvature dei segni diacritici

That's true, but it could be fixed in a better transliteration if we had consistent characteristics to identify. Instead we have a continuum. In your own writing I don't see the differences (=) between those you interpret differently:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

I have published a more detailed chart. 

The main difficulty to get a correct transliteration of the manuscript's handwriting is to distinguish the similar glyphs. 

There are 4 levels of control to be applied when there is a doubt:

- by magnifying the sign, examine the sequence of the traits, an inverted U with a tail can be confused with an  a. 

- des   or   est   can be confused with 8

- the bench. C--C  can be confuse with C - - T

The 4th level is  syntactic by  exclusion

Even if I have all the correspondence Glyph- alphabet letters, the problem is to correctly read the glyphs and not confuse them.