Please identify your six of seven various objects.
I see four quasi-tower-like structures and above that an area combining blue paint and the typical, asterisk star icons found in many other places. It's interesting to note that this area is 'fastened' (like a piece of fabric) to the thinner 'towers' at the far sides. And yet, there are multiple, blue painted projections coming forward, which completely miss the larger, more robust 'towers' in the foreground.
The painted pattern around the outer edge of the star-containing area is another example of an asymmetrical nebuly line, one that is plain on one side and more elaborate on the other. In this case, a standard "head and shoulders" design, somewhat similar to a fleur-de-lis.
What is the purpose? To engage the reader's interest. To appear to be astral and exotic. Yet to give no definitive indications. Unless, of course, the identity is plainly written down in the accompanying text.
Given that we have several methods of language interpretation in the mix these days, there should be *no problem* in learning what the relevant script was intended to tell us. If the purported alphabet and language are known, then ostensibly there should be words - open to interpretation. It either works or it does not.
I see four quasi-tower-like structures and above that an area combining blue paint and the typical, asterisk star icons found in many other places. It's interesting to note that this area is 'fastened' (like a piece of fabric) to the thinner 'towers' at the far sides. And yet, there are multiple, blue painted projections coming forward, which completely miss the larger, more robust 'towers' in the foreground.
The painted pattern around the outer edge of the star-containing area is another example of an asymmetrical nebuly line, one that is plain on one side and more elaborate on the other. In this case, a standard "head and shoulders" design, somewhat similar to a fleur-de-lis.
What is the purpose? To engage the reader's interest. To appear to be astral and exotic. Yet to give no definitive indications. Unless, of course, the identity is plainly written down in the accompanying text.
Given that we have several methods of language interpretation in the mix these days, there should be *no problem* in learning what the relevant script was intended to tell us. If the purported alphabet and language are known, then ostensibly there should be words - open to interpretation. It either works or it does not.