116v

[Helmut Winkler]

if I undestand correctly this means that goat liver is exchanged for one kreuzer?!

that is orrect, it is sold or bought for a k.

Modern German "um" is still "for" as in "goat liver for a kreuzer".

That is corret as well

can somebody please have a look and explain which grammar form would that be?

um is a preposition going with an accusative, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Which dialect would have "en" for "ein"? Something Luxembourgish? Or maybe Low German?

I think something North German in the widest sense, South G. would be 'a'

Would then the first line of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. "pox leber um en something illegible" be as simple as that?

Your fundamental mistake is that you misread p as v/u. With the exeption of the p in pox the p in this text has  a very small descender, but it is the same letter in its upper part. If the scribe wrote it that way  or if part of the descenders were wiped out I am not giving a judgement here, but I think he wrote it that way The text after poxleber is pmm which I interpret  as primum, the next group of letters I read as putrefct  and interpret as putrefacit. There are some great palaeographers and Latinists around in this place, if they think different, they can tell me so