13-10-2020, 06:58 AM
@ You have a funny way of looking at things.
At post 53 you see an S with a bow. This does not fit you because 2 S are written behind each other.
At post 55 you have the "des" with a normal S at the end, but that doesn't fit you because it has no loop.
But never mind. I find for you an "des" with an S where also has a loop.
Furthermore, the sentence with "mel and del" simply makes no sense. And not with "ven" anyway.
The sentence is very clear. "y den mus des" and then must des. It is spelled correctly for 1400, and even the dialect is correct.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)
At post 53 you see an S with a bow. This does not fit you because 2 S are written behind each other.
At post 55 you have the "des" with a normal S at the end, but that doesn't fit you because it has no loop.
But never mind. I find for you an "des" with an S where also has a loop.
Furthermore, the sentence with "mel and del" simply makes no sense. And not with "ven" anyway.
The sentence is very clear. "y den mus des" and then must des. It is spelled correctly for 1400, and even the dialect is correct.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)