24-09-2020, 11:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 24-09-2020, 11:11 PM by Mark Knowles.)
Take the words cat, rat, mat, hat. These are all spelled very similarly and could be repeated as labels against many different drawings, but then you end up with something that is possible, but ultimately nonsensical. If the choice is only between meaningless gibberish and meaningful gibberish I am not sure what is better.
Then when you combine this serious label issue with other related issues it really stretches credulity that they can all be explained away.
The only explanation that makes sense to me is that there is some nullity there I.e. there is at least some meaningless text. That could mean all the text is meaningless or alternatively some is meaningful and some not meaningful.
I have reasons why I don't believe all the text is meaningless, so I arrived at the position that some is meaningless and some is not, which essentially means that there is filler text or what I term null words.
Then when you combine this serious label issue with other related issues it really stretches credulity that they can all be explained away.
The only explanation that makes sense to me is that there is some nullity there I.e. there is at least some meaningless text. That could mean all the text is meaningless or alternatively some is meaningful and some not meaningful.
I have reasons why I don't believe all the text is meaningless, so I arrived at the position that some is meaningless and some is not, which essentially means that there is filler text or what I term null words.