11-08-2020, 10:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2020, 11:22 AM by -JKP-.
Edit Reason: added previous post link
)
(11-08-2020, 10:37 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The s in the first half of Eva-sh is not related to the stand-alone Eva-s.
...
There is no EVA-sh if you are talking about the character that looks like c^c. This is incorrect: sh. (sh)
According to the basic EVA Character chart, it is EVA-Sh. This is correct: Sh. (Sh) and it is, of course, not related to stand-alone EVA-s as I emphasized in my You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
Are you saying the Takahashi transcript has two versions of c^c (Sh)?