(10-08-2020, 07:10 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
...
While JKP doesn't like that the Voynich character e is represented by an 'e', this exactly as valid (or invalid) as using a 'c' to represent it....
By itself, this might be true, but if you are comparing to Language A with a tri-pattern of acc and Language B with a tri-pattern of lee, you will get different results depending on how it is transliterated. EVA-e is a logical one to use for experimentation. It is prevalent and concatenated occurrences of "e" and "c" characters occur in varying frequencies in different languages.
I want to see how far it will move on the graph if a small number of these glyphs were changed. It would help us visualize the extent to which the EVA mapping to plaintext influences language affinity (how to interpret ligatures is a whole other and more complicated subject).