Hello Darrin, and thank you for your post. Your analysis looks very interesting.
Could you please explain your methodology in detail, so that one would be able to replicate and build on your findings? I am particularly interested in how you dealt with comparing Voynich glyphs to alphabetic characters - since we don't have knowledge of the tonal sound of the Voynich glyphs I can instead imagine that etc the trigram-frequency distributions, or something similar, were compared among the languages. It appears to me then that one has to apply some sort of sorting algorithm to allow the vectors to be compared objectively. It strikes me that in doing so, one might be able to deduce some sort of glyph-tonal sound suggestions for the Voynich glyps based on what the most common ones are among the family of languages which are close together in the plot?
Could you please explain your methodology in detail, so that one would be able to replicate and build on your findings? I am particularly interested in how you dealt with comparing Voynich glyphs to alphabetic characters - since we don't have knowledge of the tonal sound of the Voynich glyphs I can instead imagine that etc the trigram-frequency distributions, or something similar, were compared among the languages. It appears to me then that one has to apply some sort of sorting algorithm to allow the vectors to be compared objectively. It strikes me that in doing so, one might be able to deduce some sort of glyph-tonal sound suggestions for the Voynich glyps based on what the most common ones are among the family of languages which are close together in the plot?
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)