[split] Percentage of word types that occur more than once

[ReneZ]

All this is based on the assumption that the Voynich MS words are the equivalents of complete words in some natural language.

This is a most natural assumption that is made almost automatically by most people (at least by most people presenting solutions) but I am not at all sure that it is correct.

There are arguments in favour of it and arguments against it, but both types are rather weak.

In favour: adherence (more or less) to Zipf's law
Against: unusual distribution of repeating word sequences.