09-05-2020, 03:39 AM
There is again the potential for a significant diversity of interpretation for statements like this.
Paul Weiler Wrote:
Its contents are very difficult to interpret as there are no known structures of objects depicted on it.
"No known structures" is widely interpreted as a confirmed absence of such structures - there are none to be found - anywhere.
In reality, it is a statement that the author was unable to discover any structures that could be recognized and identified during the investigative process. That doesn't mean there is nothing there. There is plenty there. Suns, moons, castles, stars, cloud-bands, an uncommon cosmic representation, (not Newbold's folly), zodiac medallions, rainbows, an Agnus Dei, Melusine and Lady Bertilak, the Golden Fleece, armorial and ecclesiastical heraldry and the Fieschi popes. Depending on how one wants to look at it, there's nothing there at all.,
Paul Weiler Wrote:
Its contents are very difficult to interpret as there are no known structures of objects depicted on it.
"No known structures" is widely interpreted as a confirmed absence of such structures - there are none to be found - anywhere.
In reality, it is a statement that the author was unable to discover any structures that could be recognized and identified during the investigative process. That doesn't mean there is nothing there. There is plenty there. Suns, moons, castles, stars, cloud-bands, an uncommon cosmic representation, (not Newbold's folly), zodiac medallions, rainbows, an Agnus Dei, Melusine and Lady Bertilak, the Golden Fleece, armorial and ecclesiastical heraldry and the Fieschi popes. Depending on how one wants to look at it, there's nothing there at all.,