08-05-2020, 11:49 PM
Interesting. He seems to know what he's talking about. Although, is this true?
From the very little that he's posted, his "one to many" approach does not appear inherently problematic. But as you say, the proof of the pudding is in the eating and there's not much pudding yet. I'm curious to see a translation attempt.
(Doesn't it feel like long ago since we had a good old Latin theory thrown our way?
)
Quote:The position where the abbreviation character 9 never however occurs, in common medieval utilisation, is at the end of the word. Although there are some Latin words which end in cum or con (but not however in cun or com), these cases are however delimited to certain forms of declension. In this case, the ending has then been written out in full or abbreviated in another manner.
From the very little that he's posted, his "one to many" approach does not appear inherently problematic. But as you say, the proof of the pudding is in the eating and there's not much pudding yet. I'm curious to see a translation attempt.
(Doesn't it feel like long ago since we had a good old Latin theory thrown our way?
)