(27-04-2020, 08:18 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Marco: but if the VM uses more patterns more consistently than any known language or similarly sized text so far, what could we learn by normalizing its supposed spelling variations/errors?
I think that, even if the manuscript is meaningful, spelling is likely inconsistent, as is the case with other manuscripts. I am not sure that there is anything to learn.
(27-04-2020, 08:18 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This would drop large-window MATTR, but that is no problem, it would probably still be well within acceptable levels. But in small-window patterns, it would only widen the gap between Voynichese and other languages, right?
I think so.
(27-04-2020, 08:18 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Or are you rather thinking about patterns of vocabulary related to similar contexts?
Most identifiable features in the manuscript, like reduplication and quasi-reduplication, Grove words, line-effects, appear problematic. Maybe a lower MATTR would make it possible to find something closer to grammatical patterns. Normalization across dialects could make shared structures detectable. But of course this is all pure speculation.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)