(14-04-2020, 09:38 PM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Rene has pointed out two adjacent words on a zodiac page which differ only in [r]/[m].
Indeed. It is not proof of anything, but I was always tempted to consider m an embellished form of r, while the example quoted by Emma (in the innermost part of Pisces) at least should give us some doubt.
If m only occurred line-finally, it would be even more suggestive that it is an embellished form, but there are too many exceptions to that.
With g I am more tempted to think that it could be an embellished d or y or even more probably a contracted dy