I think it's possible that some people wrote Romanized Persian, many languages were converted to Roman and Cyrillic-style characters and some langauges are still written in two or three different character sets.
If the creator of the VMS were trying to obscure the content without having to laboriously encipher it, Romanized Persian might be a good way to do it (just as a western language written with Arabic characters would not be noticed by most westerners).
But... the positional and frequency characteristics of the VMS are wrong for ANY natural language, so regardless of what language a person chooses for a solution, that person HAS to explain these differences if they are proposing a simple-substitution transliteration.
If the creator of the VMS were trying to obscure the content without having to laboriously encipher it, Romanized Persian might be a good way to do it (just as a western language written with Arabic characters would not be noticed by most westerners).
But... the positional and frequency characteristics of the VMS are wrong for ANY natural language, so regardless of what language a person chooses for a solution, that person HAS to explain these differences if they are proposing a simple-substitution transliteration.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)