19-01-2020, 11:51 PM
I refer to them as Quire 20, wraps it up nicely with no misleading terminology, easy to find that way too if someone wants to know where to look for them. Dense text could be mistaken for other text only pages. Starred text would be ok i guess.
I tend to think of them as being linked with the zodiac nymphs because of the stars, especially the ones with tails. I think they are historical in nature although i have no concrete reasoning behind that idea. I also think they might have a lot in common with quire 13, due to the use of eva qo. Although a few plant pages also come up there is a larger correlation with quire 13, which on its face does not seem to have anything to do with the plants or recipes.
So, i do not think they are recipes and probably not related heavily with the plants, and agree that a more generic name should be used when referring to this section of the manuscript. Similarly with quire 13, the use of biological is incorrect in my view, same with balneological, although that is a bit better.
I tend to think of them as being linked with the zodiac nymphs because of the stars, especially the ones with tails. I think they are historical in nature although i have no concrete reasoning behind that idea. I also think they might have a lot in common with quire 13, due to the use of eva qo. Although a few plant pages also come up there is a larger correlation with quire 13, which on its face does not seem to have anything to do with the plants or recipes.
So, i do not think they are recipes and probably not related heavily with the plants, and agree that a more generic name should be used when referring to this section of the manuscript. Similarly with quire 13, the use of biological is incorrect in my view, same with balneological, although that is a bit better.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)