03-01-2020, 12:53 AM
Of course, it depends how the letters are interpreted. If one reads it as "so nim gaf mich" then it's "so [to] take gave me". If it's "so nim gäs mi[l]ch" then it's a different interpretation.
By the way, Walsen/Palsen can also be interpreted as names. So if it were interpreted as Palsen or Walsen Presbyteren would be like saying, Walsen, the Presbyter with "-en" as the article. Those names did exist in the middle ages.
I'm really leaning toward it being palsen pbren. You can see the descenders if you look closely, but they are faded or washed out (like the descender in "so") and flat-bottomed "v" wasn't written like that (I collected a lot of flat-bottomed vees in order to try to figure out if it was "v"—if it is, it's very nonstandard).
By the way, Walsen/Palsen can also be interpreted as names. So if it were interpreted as Palsen or Walsen Presbyteren would be like saying, Walsen, the Presbyter with "-en" as the article. Those names did exist in the middle ages.
I'm really leaning toward it being palsen pbren. You can see the descenders if you look closely, but they are faded or washed out (like the descender in "so") and flat-bottomed "v" wasn't written like that (I collected a lot of flat-bottomed vees in order to try to figure out if it was "v"—if it is, it's very nonstandard).