These are counts based on Takahashi's transliteration. As always, I could have made errors.
More than half of the chd words in A appear either at line-end or before an image-break (21/40). I agree that this is a large deviation from what is expected. A slight preference for these positions in still observable in B - this is clearer for the before-plant position, 2.2% of chd words appearing there vs an average (and expected) 0.6%.
Things are harder for shd, since the pattern is quite rare in A and shows even less preference in B.
| line-end_A | bef-plant_A | ALL_A || line-end_B | bef-plant_B | ALL_B
ch | 276 | 7.3% | 224 | 5.9% | 3799 || 483 | 7.8% | 43 | 0.7% | 6170
chd | 14 | 35.0% | 7 | 17.5% | 40 || 85 | 11.5% | 16 | 2.2% | 742
sh | 59 | 4.3% | 57 | 4.2% | 1368 || 124 | 4.3% | 5 | 0.2% | 2865
shd | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 37.5% | 8 || 15 | 9.3% | 1 | 0.6% | 162
AVG | 1791| 14.1% | 1050| 8.3% | 12716 || 2716| 11.0% |183 | 0.7% | 24586
More than half of the chd words in A appear either at line-end or before an image-break (21/40). I agree that this is a large deviation from what is expected. A slight preference for these positions in still observable in B - this is clearer for the before-plant position, 2.2% of chd words appearing there vs an average (and expected) 0.6%.
Things are harder for shd, since the pattern is quite rare in A and shows even less preference in B.
| line-end_A | bef-plant_A | ALL_A || line-end_B | bef-plant_B | ALL_B
ch | 276 | 7.3% | 224 | 5.9% | 3799 || 483 | 7.8% | 43 | 0.7% | 6170
chd | 14 | 35.0% | 7 | 17.5% | 40 || 85 | 11.5% | 16 | 2.2% | 742
sh | 59 | 4.3% | 57 | 4.2% | 1368 || 124 | 4.3% | 5 | 0.2% | 2865
shd | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 37.5% | 8 || 15 | 9.3% | 1 | 0.6% | 162
AVG | 1791| 14.1% | 1050| 8.3% | 12716 || 2716| 11.0% |183 | 0.7% | 24586
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)